As software developers, we all strive to create more robust, sustainable, and reliable software. But how we can guarantee that a piece of truly works flawlessly? This is where Test-Driven Development (TDD) can give us a competitive edge! TDD brings discipline to the software development process, allowing us to detect errors early and minimize potential risks, helping us keep project costs under control. Especially in large-scale projects, when we consider the costs that a single error can cause, we can better understand the critical role of TDD.

So, what exactly is TDD, and why should you adopt it today? In this article, we will explore the core principle of TDD, its advantages and disadvantages, and how to apply it with a simple Java example. If you want to enhance your software quality, there’s no better time than now to start implementing TDD! 🚀

‍

Test-Driven Development (TDD) Principles‍

TDD is an approach popularized by Kent Beck in the software development world. Although its foundations date back to the mid-20th century, Beck systematized this method and integrated it into the software development process. In his book "Test-Driven Development", he outlined principles that emphasize writing tests before writing code and guiding the development process based on these tests. Now, let's take a closer look at these principles.
The core principles of TDD revolve around the Red-Green-Refactor cycle, consisting of three main steps that bring discipline to the software development process:

1. Red - Write a failing test
2. Green - Past the test with minimal code
3. Refactor - Clean and improve the code

Step 1: Identifying Errors Early (Red)

First, a test is written for the function or feature to be developed. Since the corresponding code has not been written yet, the test is expected to fail. At first glance, this step may seem like a waste of time; however, it plays a crucial role in ensuring that the requirements are correctly understood and that the tests address a real need.

Step 2: Passing the Test with Minimal Code (Green)

In the second phase of the TDD cycle, the Green step, the goal is to write the simplest and fastest possible code to pass the test. At this stage, the code does not need to be perfect; the important thing is ensuring that the test successfully passes. This step is crucial in preventing unnecessary code from being written. Most importantly, it guarantees that the code works as expected.

At this stage, no optimization or design improvements are made, as these are handled in the Refactor phase.

Step 3: Improving Code Quality (Refactor)

At this stage, the goal is to make the successfully tested code more readable, optimized, and maintainable. This involves enhancing performance, eliminating redundant code, and improving the overall design. The key point in the refactoring process is ensuring that tests remain intact and functionality is preserved.

‍

Applying TDD principles is actually much simpler than it seems, yet the benefits it provides are substantial. By following a simple cycle (Red-Green-Refactor), we can detect errors early, prevent unnecessary code, and make our codebase more sustainable. What starts as small incremental steps ultimately leads to significant improvements in software quality, helping us build a more reliable and flexible system in the long run.

‍

We’ve Discussed Its Advantages, But What About Its Disadvantages?

Throughout this article, we have highlighted the advantages of TDD. One of its greatest benefits is preventing cost losses caused by errors that may arise in later stages of a project. Additionally, it is an effective method that helps developers adopt a disciplined approach and write high-quality, maintainable code. However, like any methodology, TDD has some disadvantages as well.

First, TDD requires more time and discipline. In traditional software development, code is written first, and tests come later. Since many developers are accustomed to this approach, the reversed process required by TDD can initially slow down development speed. However, it is important to remember that TDD is a discipline. Once adopted, it significantly reduces debugging time and creates a well-balanced development process in the long run.

Another disadvantage is that TDD is not suitable for every scenario. In projects with uncertain or frequently changing requirements, writing tests upfront can be a waste of time. Similarly, in projects that require quick solutions, a test-driven development process can introduce additional overhead and lead to a loss of flexibility.

In conclusion, TDD is a powerful approach that enhances software quality, detects errors early, and reduces costs in the long run. However, it may not be ideal for every project and requires additional time and discipline at the beginning. The key is to evaluate both the advantages and disadvantages of TDD and ensure that it is applied to the right projects in the right way.

‍

TDD with a Java Example: A Simple Balance Management System

To understand the discipline of TDD, let's apply it to a real-world example using Java. In this scenario, we will develop an Account class for our banking application. This class will allow users to deposit money, withdraw money, and view their current balance. However, since we are following TDD principles, we will start by writing our tests first.

1️⃣ Red Phase - Writing a Failing Test

First, we write a JUnit test to check the initial balance of the account and the getBalance() method. At this stage, the test is expected to fail, as we have not yet created Account class or its methods.

import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import static org.junit.jupiter.api.Assertions.*;

class AccountTest {

    @Test
    void should_return_account_balance() {
        Account account = new Account(100);
        assertEquals(100, account.getBalance());
    }
}
  

At this stage, when the code is executed, the test is expected to fail because the Account class has not been defined yet.

I would like to draw your attention to the fact that when applying the TDD process, your test method names should clearly and concisely express their purpose. Names like should return account balance directly convey the test's intent and improve readability by avoiding unnecessary words. This way, anyone reviewing the tests can easily understand what is being verified just by looking at the method names.

2️⃣ Green Phase - Passing the Test with Minimal Code

Now, we write the minimal code required for the test to pass.

class Account {
    private int balance;

    public Account(int initialBalance) {
        this.balance = initialBalance;
    }

    public int getBalance() {
        return balance;
    }
}
  

After adding this code, the getBalance() method will successfully pass the test, and we will reach the Green phase.

3️⃣ Refactor Phase - Making the Code Cleaner

Our code is quite simple at the moment, but we will continue improving it. Now, let’s add tests for deposit and withdrawal operations.

@Test
void should_return_updated_balance_after_deposit() {
    Account account = new Account(100);
    account.deposit(50);
    assertEquals(150, account.getBalance());
}

@Test
void should_return_updated_balance_after_withdraw() {
    Account account = new Account(100);
    account.withdraw(30);
    assertEquals(70, account.getBalance());
}

@Test
void should_not_allow_withdraw_when_insufficient_funds() {
    Account account = new Account(50);
    account.withdraw(100);
    assertEquals(50, account.getBalance()); 
}
  

These tests will fail because deposit() and withdraw() methods have not been implemented yet. Next, we write the minimum required code to pass these tests.

public void deposit(int amount) {
    balance += amount;
}

public void withdraw(int amount) {
    if (amount <= balance) {
        balance -= amount;
    }
}
  

At this point, all our tests successfully reach the Green phase. Finally, the code can be reviewed for redundancies and optimized as part of the Refactor phase.

‍

Conclusion

In this example, we applied the Red-Grean-Refactor cycle step by step, demonstrating how we develop software in a test-driven manner from the very beginning. Thanks to TDD:

✅ We clarified requirements before writing any code.

✅ We validated our software at every stage through tests.

✅ We avoided unnecessary code and created a more sustainable structure.

‍

“See you in our next blog post! Wishing you clean code and successful tests!🚀 As the Plaincoder team, we are with you on your journey in the world of software development.”

‍